Baseball system--input needed

Search

New member
Joined
Nov 2, 2006
Messages
1,096
Tokens
I already put this in the basebal forum but seeing as it isnt baseball season yet it might get some extra looks here:
Last season, my friend and i came up with a baseball system that failed mostly due to bankrolls that were too small. In theory i think it can work and i would like some input from the posters here.
Ok for bankroll's sake lets say you start with 10,000 and make your base 200. The goal for each day is to make .02 of your base as profit. You do this by choosing 2 teams at the beginning of the season that are built to win a majority of their games, not play eachother (this isnt too important), and are not as subseptible to a long losing streak. Off the top of my head, this year i'd pick the Yankees and Dodgers, Cardinals or Mets (one from each league).
On day one you'd be trying to turn your 200 into 204 (1.02^1 *200) by betting on the money line of each of those teams--lets say theyre at -200 (which is probably going to end up being the average.)--so you risk 8 (4 to win 2 on each game) total.
On day two you'd be trying to turn your 200 into 208.08 (1.02^2 * 200) regardless of whether you won or lost the day before. If you had lost you'd be looking at a base of 192 and risking 16.08 on each game to win 8.04 give or take. If you had won or the teams split it wouldnt be as large of a margin (this is the reason for having two teams and also for having a much larger bankroll than your base).
If multiplied over an entire season (for arguments sake i'm going to only do 155 games and days when one team is off you risk all on the team playing) the formula would look like: 1.02^155* 200 and should net you 4305.82 in profit for the season.
If the percentage was 5 instead of 2, it would net you a staggering 384920.77.
Barring a losing streak and if you have a large enough bankroll i think both options and any in between could be very profitable--i, however, do not have access to a bankroll anywhere near what i'd nead to attemp this at this time. Any feedback or suggestions would be very appreciated
 

New member
Joined
Dec 10, 2006
Messages
1,059
Tokens
asufan, is this a variation of some martingale system for baseball? If it is maybe you should just post the results on this forum for a season and see how it fares. I know the NBA Road System is also a very successful system that requires alot of nutsacks and bankroll. Would love to see if your system working out.
 

EX LFC BALL BOY
Joined
Jan 21, 2001
Messages
1,888
Tokens
IMO one season is not enough to prove anything. Martingale systems have a bad rep in the RX because they burned a lot of punters who half assed these unproven systems. I have 3 questions

1. How big a bet can a person start with? (with the limits we get from bookies)
2. what if the team is playing two games on the same day?
3. What if the team chosen, turned out shit, not only that, goes 0-10 in their last 10 games of the season?
 

New member
Joined
May 4, 2006
Messages
2,769
Tokens
If I knew which team would not have an extended losing streak I ride them all season long and if they did lose say two in a row I would martingale like a mutha since i KNEW the losing streak would be short lived. During the course of a long baseball season even the top tier teams can have a bad month. Look at the Cardinals last season. If you picked them as your NL team you would have been screwed at some point. If you did pick a team that had a 110 win season or better, by the time you got to July the ML on that team would be outrageous.
 

New member
Joined
Nov 2, 2006
Messages
1,096
Tokens
Well all of those reasons are why the bankroll is so large, and the base amount is such a low percentage of it--obviously i can't say for sure whether or not a team is going to have a long losing streak, but its safe to say the yankees are not as subseptible to one as say the royals are.
If a team plays 2 games on the same day (for a total of 3 games that day i assume) you divide how much you want to win by 3 instead of by 2
I used 155 games because i dont believe the last 9 or 10 should wagered on unless in a pennant race.
Its obviously still gambling--i just figure that a system like this has more potential than picking random teams throughout the year.
I think i will post the hypothetical results daily in the baseball forum so it can be tracked
Thanks for the replies and criticism--everything helps
and btw, alamorich, the cardinals were my nl team last season and i ended up losing my ass so thats certainly a valid point
 

EX LFC BALL BOY
Joined
Jan 21, 2001
Messages
1,888
Tokens
Guys, we have all these odds achives it's not like we couldn't track down the past results, it's hard work but it's such a potential bankroll killer that whoever interested must be damn sure.
 

Forum statistics

Threads
1,120,345
Messages
13,580,601
Members
100,966
Latest member
theredzone1
The RX is the sports betting industry's leading information portal for bonuses, picks, and sportsbook reviews. Find the best deals offered by a sportsbook in your state and browse our free picks section.FacebookTwitterInstagramContact Usforum@therx.com